Thursday, March 02, 2006
9x
Lol, this place needs some seirous updating. Ok, so what happened these few days right. Ok, let's see. We had an interlectual discussion about IQ with dh the other day, in which we were finally able to understand why some people - such as owl and amos - are smarter than others. For one, not only does amos NOT lose IQ, he dRiNkS the IQ of others. Here we assume that IQ and WF are the same thing. If you don't know what either means, too bad =p
Then today, we discussed some chemistry and dota. The strange question that hass puzzled many for generations has resurfaced: Whether it is more advantageous for a SPECIE to be more imba in the top (lane) e.g. 9x, or in the bottom (lane). Surprisingly, the vote tally was 3-1 with BCH voting for 9x and K voting for a imba bottom hero. Useless, as usual, was incommunicado. Anyway, let me briefly summarize the advantages of one such as 9x compared to a more-substituted halogenoalkane. With 9x, there is no plausible stearic hindrance, unlike in the latter case. Thus, for 9x, it is still possible for a 'backside attack' in order for the formation of racemic mixture. However, and sadly, for a bot imba specie, there is great stearic hindrance, hence preventing all backside attacks, leading to an optically active mixture. Thus, in conclusion, it is better for a specie to be top imba rather than bot.
PS. From this, we can infer that kel does not like the 'backside attack' rxn. =P
bhuck-ed by tmX @ 1:59 PM
-